1. Identify the benefits of both subsistence patterns:
The hunter-gatherer subsistence pattern provided many benefits. It’s important to understand the food supply of the hunter-gatherers is obtained from wild resources. They do not rely on domesticated plants or animals. It is also important to state that this has been the dominant means of subsistence for 99.5 percent of the 2.5 million years of human existence. One of the benefits of hunter-gatherer lifestyle is the fact that the food supply was rich in nutrients. The hard work that was placed into hunting and gathering allowed for the people to be in good physical shape. In recent years we have learned that the hunter-gatherers actually only worked between 4-5 hours a day, allowing them more leisure time.
Agriculture also has its own benefits. Farmers are able to provide food both locally and globally. Without their crops and livestock, the world's food supply would be extremely limited. Some people believe that agriculture can improve air quality. The crops are release oxygen into the air, which as humans we need to survive. Some scientists also believe that agriculture can lessen the chance of flooding because the areas of grass that used to raise livestock can reduce the amount of soil erosions by fifty to eighty percent. Agriculture (early on) also allowed populations to grow and diversify by creating civilizations.
2.
Identify
the costs (or disadvantages) of both subsistence patterns:
Being
a hunter-gatherer also had its disadvantages. First of all they were small
populations that generally had to move from one place to another in order to
sustain. There were a lot of tribal wars to gain territories for food supplies.
The wars and the moving around made it difficult to survive.Agriculture presents its own share of disadvantages (in particular modern agriculture). First of all there is the removal of buffers to make large fields. These fields provide for maximum efficiency and lower food costs. Yet by doing this we are taking away from the natural habitat of some wild creatures. This can lead to soil erosions. The use of fertilizer is another issue. These fertilizers are harmful to the environment. The same is true for pesticides and other chemicals that end up in our rivers and lakes.
3. Which subsistence pattern provides a healthier diet? Explain.
I believe that agriculture (although has many disadvantages) provides a healthier lifestyle. With our advanced technology we are able to add nutrients to our food sources as needed. I simply don’t believe that the world today with all its inhabitants could survive on a hunter-gatherer lifestyle. Although there are fears of contamination within our food sources all the time, we still have a much larger ratio of producing non-contaminated products.
4.
Discuss
why you think some human populations made the transition into agriculture?
I think there
are a few reasons why many human populations transitioned to agriculture.I think that the hunter0gatherer lifestyle consisted too much of moving around
and that was not appealing to the people. Also I think they believed that
agricultural life is inherently superior to
foraging. Another good reason with be the constant environmental changes, that didn’t allow for moving around as often.
Economics and Trade:
1. There is a direct
relationship between the availability of surplus and the ability to trade:
This statement is trying to explain that there is a
definite connection between excess supplies and trade. In other words whenever
a person or society has more supply of one item than needed, they can trade
with others for supplies which they don’t have, but need. This allows for
populations to use their surplus of items to their advantage by means of trade.
2.
Identify
and describe two (2) social benefits of trade:
One of the social benefits of trade is the ability
to learn and obtain items that are not common to our own culture and society.
In other words we can get food, clothing and even medicinal products from other
societies through trade. We can also learn technological advancements from
other societies.
Another social benefit of trade is the amount of
travel and connection it has created amongst the peoples of the world. There is
a large amount of people that travel for business and trade, and there are
those that will return for vacations.
3.
Identify
and describe two (2) negative social results of the development of trade:
One of the negative aspects of trade is that some societies
get too involved politically with the other societies. Sometimes wars have occurred
in history because one culture wanted to take over the land and supplies of
other cultures. Another negative is that some societies depend on others for
their supplies, and this can be detrimental to a society’s welfare.
4.
Given
your answer in the question #1, explain the relationship between the
development of agriculture and the development of trade:
I believe that the birth of agriculture also
allowed for the advancements of trade. In fact with agriculture there was a
definite more stable environment and the ability to create surplus. Then the
surplus is what can give way to trade with other societies. With agriculture there was room to create a
lot more products, and therefore a lot more to trade.
Just throwing this out there, because I'm realizing this is a common contention in many posts: Why is having smaller populations seen as a disadvantage for hunter-gather cultures? Why are larger populations seen as being advantageous? Is this a justified assumption?
ReplyDeleteIn our modern culture, we can add nutrients needed to our agricultural diet, but that is only recently. That is a recent adaptation and actually is separate from agriculture itself. So without that cultural adaptation, is an agricultural diet still healthier than hunter gatherer?
Great discussion on trade. Overall, good post with just those few questions.
We have to same perceptions on these questions. I agree with you on agriculture being more healthier for society in the long run. I liked your response to trade, excess in agriculture does give that society an area of business. Also, I liked your explanation on how trade benefits a society by introducing them to products that they couldn't otherwise obtain.
ReplyDeleteGood post. I liked your example of negative social aspects of trade sometimes leading to war. I think many wars have started due to trade. These wars have not only started because of trade with one party, but they have started because one party's trading partner decided to do business with the first party's enemy.
ReplyDeleteTrade has it's positives and negatives, but as a global economy we couldn't ever stop trading because people would suffer around the world. Additionally, it is nearly impossible to live in the United States without trading in some way. A person could own a ranch and produce everything they would ever need so that they would never need to trade for anything, but they would eventually have to pay property taxes on their ranch, so they would have to grow a surplus to sell to pay the taxes. In other words, trade is inevitable today.
Do you think there is any situation in which people in the United States could survive without trade?
I do agree that agriculture allowed for the advancements of trade as you talked about. And what I find interesting this that trading thrives on having a consistent product that can only be supplied and given out through the agricultural system. The farmers that you talked about earlier craft and hone their product because that is what they do time in a time out. In the hunter-gather society they would pick from the land but wouldn't everyone in the same place have the same ingredients? And how would it grow?
ReplyDelete